<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Logon uses a tuned version of FreeLing.
<br>
If you remove it, users that install a vanilla version in their
PCs, will not get appropriate interface.<br>
<br>
So, you should keep at least the code that interfaces FreeLing
with logon, but then, the user will need to compile it to match
its local installation of FreeLing.<br>
<br>
Lluis<br>
<br>
<br>
El 02/05/16 a les 10:14, Montserrat Marimon ha escrit:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOLmcHTo6=1WX2ReC4_C+sMbKJAPW_4q9XP_Q9_sBQQUDbQB=A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi Stephan,<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Yes, no problem at all. Anyway, unfortunately, I haven't
been able to work on the grammar for a long long time and I
don't known when I'll be able to work on it again... <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>All best,<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Montse.-<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Stephan
Oepen <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no" target="_blank">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">dear
montse and lluís,<br>
<br>
i am preparing a new release of the LOGON tree for the
summer, and i<br>
am wondering whether it still makes sense to include a copy
of<br>
FreeLing (inside the ‘upc/’ directory of the LOGON tree)?
while i<br>
used to subscribe to the philosophy that all tools
transcending basic,<br>
stable OS functionality should be versioned as part of the
LOGON<br>
distribution, i am gradually backing out of that point of
view—now<br>
trying to better balance storage needs vs. ease of
installation (and<br>
replicability). for example, i am happy nowadays to assume
that Java<br>
and Python are available on a target system and need not be
maintained<br>
as part of the LOGON tree. a similar line of reasoning, i
think,<br>
could be applied to FreeLing then.<br>
<br>
what do you think? oe<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>