<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Stephan,<br><br></div><div>Yes, no problem at all. Anyway, unfortunately, I haven't been able to work on the grammar for a long long time and I don't known when I'll be able to work on it again... <br><br></div><div>All best,<br><br></div><div>Montse.-<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Stephan Oepen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oe@ifi.uio.no" target="_blank">oe@ifi.uio.no</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">dear montse and lluís,<br>
<br>
i am preparing a new release of the LOGON tree for the summer, and i<br>
am wondering whether it still makes sense to include a copy of<br>
FreeLing (inside the ‘upc/’ directory of the LOGON tree)? while i<br>
used to subscribe to the philosophy that all tools transcending basic,<br>
stable OS functionality should be versioned as part of the LOGON<br>
distribution, i am gradually backing out of that point of view—now<br>
trying to better balance storage needs vs. ease of installation (and<br>
replicability). for example, i am happy nowadays to assume that Java<br>
and Python are available on a target system and need not be maintained<br>
as part of the LOGON tree. a similar line of reasoning, i think,<br>
could be applied to FreeLing then.<br>
<br>
what do you think? oe<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>