[logon] dropping FreeLing from the LOGON tree

[Lluís Padró]

Logon uses a tuned version of FreeLing.
If you remove it, users that install a vanilla version in their PCs, 
will not get appropriate interface.

So, you should keep at least the code that interfaces FreeLing with 
logon, but then, the user will need to compile it to match its local 
installation of FreeLing.

         Lluis


El 02/05/16 a les 10:14, Montserrat Marimon ha escrit:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> Yes, no problem at all. Anyway, unfortunately, I haven't been able to 
> work on the grammar for a long long time and I don't known when I'll 
> be able to work on it again...
>
> All best,
>
> Montse.-
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no 
> <mailto:oe at ifi.uio.no>> wrote:
>
>     dear montse and lluís,
>
>     i am preparing a new release of the LOGON tree for the summer, and i
>     am wondering whether it still makes sense to include a copy of
>     FreeLing (inside the ‘upc/’ directory of the LOGON tree)? while i
>     used to subscribe to the philosophy that all tools transcending basic,
>     stable OS functionality should be versioned as part of the LOGON
>     distribution, i am gradually backing out of that point of view—now
>     trying to better balance storage needs vs. ease of installation (and
>     replicability).  for example, i am happy nowadays to assume that Java
>     and Python are available on a target system and need not be maintained
>     as part of the LOGON tree.  a similar line of reasoning, i think,
>     could be applied to FreeLing then.
>
>     what do you think?  oe
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.emmtee.net/archives/logon/attachments/20160502/52c71691/attachment.html>