[logon] dropping FreeLing from the LOGON tree

Montserrat Marimon montserrat.marimon at gmail.com
Mon May 2 10:14:34 CEST 2016


Hi Stephan,

Yes, no problem at all. Anyway, unfortunately, I haven't been able to work
on the grammar for a long long time and I don't known when I'll be able to
work on it again...

All best,

Montse.-

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Stephan Oepen <oe at ifi.uio.no> wrote:

> dear montse and lluís,
>
> i am preparing a new release of the LOGON tree for the summer, and i
> am wondering whether it still makes sense to include a copy of
> FreeLing (inside the ‘upc/’ directory of the LOGON tree)?  while i
> used to subscribe to the philosophy that all tools transcending basic,
> stable OS functionality should be versioned as part of the LOGON
> distribution, i am gradually backing out of that point of view—now
> trying to better balance storage needs vs. ease of installation (and
> replicability).  for example, i am happy nowadays to assume that Java
> and Python are available on a target system and need not be maintained
> as part of the LOGON tree.  a similar line of reasoning, i think,
> could be applied to FreeLing then.
>
> what do you think?  oe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.emmtee.net/archives/logon/attachments/20160502/01aaee23/attachment.html>


More information about the logon mailing list